Except he didn't have the competency his father had where he kept the country out of wars and focused on continual industrialization and economic growth. Had Alexander III sat on the throne in place of Nicholas II, stuff like the Russso Japanese War and even ww1 wouldn't have happened in the first place.The Autocratic system was failing regardless; Nicky's policies were just what Alexander would have done.
Because as we all know, having a republican government just instantly makes things better! Just look at the provisional government of Russia during ww1 or the First Republic in Brazil, clearly major advancements and beacons of competence and advancement.I've been on this site since 2009 and every time I think I've become jaded at people's ability to defend reactionary monarchies I am freshly astonished.
While I agree with your point, as I mentioned above, this is the wrong thread to discuss stuff like this/is way off-topic.Because as we all know, having a republican government just instantly makes things better! Just look at the provisional government of Russia during ww1 or the First Republic in Brazil, clearly major advancements and beacons of competence and advancement.
I do apologize as I often get bogged down on arguing and accidentally drift off the thread.While I agree with your point, as I mentioned above, this is the wrong thread to discuss stuff like this/is way off-topic.
No problem!I do apologize as I often get bogged down on arguing and accidentally drift off the thread.
Russians defending some kind of autocracy:I've been on this site since 2009 and every time I think I've become jaded at people's ability to defend reactionary monarchies I am freshly astonished.